Recital 90
(90) Once the consumer has been provided with a remedy as a follow-up to a recall, the consumer could not be entitled to a remedy for non-conformity of the good with the contract for reasons connected with the fact that the product was dangerous because the non-conformity does not exist anymore. Similarly, in the event that the consumer invokes the consumer’s rights to a remedy under Directive (EU) 2019/770 or Directive (EU) 2019/771, the consumer is not entitled to a remedy under this Regulation for the same safety issue. However, if other requirements for conformity regarding the same good are not fulfilled, the seller would remain liable for such non-conformity of the good with the contract even if there has been a remedy provided to the consumer following a recall of a dangerous product.
← Recital 89 · All articles · Recital 91 →
Source: EUR-Lex CELLAR · retrieved 2026-08-26 · Text as adopted (Official Journal); later amendments are not incorporated in this text.