Recital 24

(24) Given the interference in the right to property caused by freezing orders, such provisional measures should not be maintained longer than necessary to preserve the availability of the property with a view to possible subsequent confiscation. Maintaining such provisional measures might require a review by a national court in order to ensure that the purpose of preventing the disappearance of property remains valid.

← Recital 23 · All articles · Recital 25 →

Source: EUR-Lex CELLAR · retrieved 2026-09-04 · Text as adopted (Official Journal); later amendments are not incorporated in this text.