lexiara

(45)

CRR3

Article 115 is amended as follows: the following paragraph is inserted: ‘-1. Exposures to regional governments or local authorities for which a credit assessment by a nominated ECAI is available shall be assigned a risk weight in accordance with Table 1 which corresponds to the credit assessment of the ECAI in accordance with Article 136. Table 1 ’; Credit quality step | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 Risk weight | 20 % | 50 % | 50 % | 100 % | 100 % | 150 % paragraph 1 is replaced by the following: ‘1. Exposures to regional governments or local authorities for which a credit assessment by a nominated ECAI is not available shall be assigned a risk weight in accordance with the credit quality step to which exposures to the central government of the jurisdiction in which regional governments or local authorities are incorporated are assigned in accordance with Table 2. Table 2 For exposures referred to in the first subparagraph, a risk weight of 100 % shall be assigned where the central government of the jurisdiction in which regional governments or local authorities are incorporated is unrated.’ ; Credit quality step | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 Risk weight | 20 % | 50 % | 100 % | 100 % | 100 % | 150 % in paragraph 2, the first subparagraph is replaced by the following: ‘By way of derogation from paragraphs - 1 and 1, exposures to regional governments or local authorities shall be treated as exposures to the central government in whose jurisdiction they are established where there is no difference in risk between such exposures because of the specific revenue-raising powers of the former, and the existence of specific institutional arrangements the effect of which is to reduce their risk of default.’ ; paragraph 3 is replaced by the following: ‘3. Exposures to churches or religious communities constituted in the form of a legal person under public law shall, in so far as they raise taxes in accordance with legal acts conferring on them the right to do so, be treated as exposures to regional governments and local authorities. In that case, paragraph 2 shall not apply.’ ; in paragraph 4, the first subparagraph is replaced by the following: ‘By way of derogation from paragraphs - 1 and 1, where competent authorities of a third-country which applies supervisory and regulatory arrangements at least equivalent to those applied in the Union treat exposures to regional governments or local authorities as exposures to their central government and there is no difference in risk between such exposures because of the specific revenue-raising powers of regional government or local authorities and to specific institutional arrangements to reduce the risk of default, institutions may risk weight exposures to such regional governments and local authorities in the same manner.’ paragraph 5 is replaced by the following: ‘5. By way of derogation from paragraphs - 1 and 1, exposures to regional governments or local authorities of the Member States that are not referred to in paragraphs 2, 3 and 4 and are denominated and funded in the domestic currency of that regional government or local authority shall be assigned a risk weight of 20 %.’ ;

· All articles ·

Source: EUR-Lex CELLAR · retrieved 2026-09-04 · Text as adopted (Official Journal); later amendments are not incorporated in this text.